MIRAS
Case Study

Automated Reporting

A system that builds the weekly report and flags what your team would miss

A marketing team was spending six hours every week pulling numbers from five different systems and formatting them into a report that was already out of date by the time anyone read it. We built a system that assembles it overnight and flags problems the team would have missed.

The problem

In this case it was a marketing team, but anyone who has to produce a recurring report will recognise the problem.

Five data sources, six hours of assembly, and by the time leadership saw the numbers they were already a week old. One person knew how to build it. When they were away, nobody got a report.

6
hours lost
Every week, manually pulling and formatting
5
data sources
Each one requiring a separate login and export
7
days stale
By the time the report landed, the data was old
1
person
If they were on holiday, nobody got a report
The approach

We sat with the team and mapped how the report was actually put together.

The team was good at their jobs. The report was just a bad use of their time. Instead of trying to make it faster to build, we removed the need to build it at all.

01
Pull and assemble
The system connects to every data source overnight and assembles a single view of the week.
02
Analyse and flag
It runs the checks the team used to do by hand, along with trend analysis across multiple weeks that they never had time for.
03
Deliver
A finished report is waiting before anyone arrives. The team reviews it and adds what they know.
What it catches

The system does more than assemble. It reads the numbers and works out what changed and why.

Watch
Declining trend detected
Issue Utilisation down 3 consecutive weeks 74% 71% 68%
Likely driver North West region Project intake slowing since mid-March
8-week trend
Recommended action Review North West pipeline and intake forecast before next planning cycle.
Trend detection
It tracks metrics over weeks, not just the latest snapshot. A slow decline that nobody notices from one week to the next gets flagged once it becomes a pattern.
Root cause identification
When something moves, the system works out why. If utilisation dropped, it will point to the region or segment behind it rather than just reporting the number.
Actionable next steps
Every flag includes a recommendation for what to look at next. The team goes straight to the issue instead of spending time working out where to start.
What changed

The report nobody wanted to build now builds itself.

The team walks in to a finished report, reviews it, adds their own notes, and moves on. The hours that used to go toward assembly now go toward doing something about what the numbers say.

Weekly Performance Summary
Auto-generated · 7 Apr 2026
Week 14 · 31 Mar – 6 Apr
Revenue
£284k +6%
Pipeline
£1.2m +3%
Utilisation
68% ↓ 3 wks
Satisfaction
4.6 Flat
Performance by region
RegionStatusRevenue
London & South EastOn track£98k
Midlands & EastOn track£76k
North WestWatch£62k
Scotland & North EastOn track£48k
For the first two weeks, the team double-checked every number by hand. By week three, they stopped.
Impact

What the team got back.

Before

  • Six hours spent assembling a report every week
  • Data was already a week old by the time it was read
  • Formatting changed depending on who built it
  • Problems buried in the numbers went unnoticed

After

  • Zero assembly time, the report arrives overnight
  • Data is from the previous day, always current
  • Consistent format and structure every week
  • Anomalies are flagged and explained automatically
What this means

Your team should be reading their reports, not building them.

We spent time with the team to understand how the report was put together and where the hours went. Then we built a system to handle it. The whole thing took eight weeks from first conversation to handover, and the team has been running it on their own since.

#Automation #Reporting #Intelligence